JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Luz Stella Buitrago Moreno Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitudes De Desacato De La Sentencia Su-484 De 2008. Se Reiteró Que, De Manera General, La Competencia Para Estudiar Y Resolver Tanto El Trámite De Cumplimiento Como El Incidente De Desacato, Corresponde Al Juez De Tutela De Primer Instancia. Con Base En Ello, Se Ordenó La Remisión De Todas Las Solicitudes De La Referencia A Los Jueces De Primera Instancia Correspondientes.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Desacato
  • Improcedencia en la Corte Constitucional por ser competencia del juez de primera instancia
Juez De Primera Instancia
  • Competente para conocer incidente de desacato
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. ORDENAR el envio de las solicitudes elevadas por LUZ STELLA BUITRAGO MORENO, MARIA DIOSELINA VARILA, LUZ MERCEDES ARIAS VANEGAS, ANA MARIA BERNAL, ANA LIBIA RAMIREZ FRANCO, MARIA VILMA OYOLA RONCANCIO, MARIA ELSY BENAVIDES QUINTERO, JOSE GUSTAVO SEGURA RAMIREZ, ANA MARITZA MARTINEZ VARGAS, ANA LUPE ROJAS MAHECHA Y ANA CONCEPCION JIMENEZ GARCIA, MARIA SABINA PAEZ MORENO, MARIA DEL CARMEN GOMEZ DE ESPANOL, DOLLY ASTRID QUIROZ RIVERA, LILIANA JAIDIVER GOMEZ CORTES, LUZ EDITH GARZON CANADULCE, MARIA DEL CARMEN LOBOA MINA, RUBIELA VERGARA DE GONZALEZ, ANA CELIA ESPINOSA PACHON, CARMEN ROSA PINEDA SALINAS, GILVERANIO CRUZ MORENO, LUZ STELLA ROMERO DE PENA, MARIA STELLA LUCERO PEREZ, MARIA DIANEY ESCOBAR ORDONEZ, MARTHA HELENA HURTADO DE TORRES, MARIA AMANDA NUNEZ SALINAS, ANA AURORA CALDERON HIDALGO, OFELIA TRASLAVINA DE RIVERA, JEANETH MARTIN MUNOZ, MARIA NIEVES JIMENEZ PENAGOS, MYRIAM AURORA QUINCHE QUIMBAY, MARTHA ELENA ROJAS OJEDA, MARIA GLORIA LEON CARDOZO, NOHORA CRISTINA MADIEDO CLAVIJO, JORGE ENRIQUE CIFUENTES LANCHEROS, GABRIELA JAIMES SANCHEZ a los Jueces de tutela de primera instancia que corresponda.
  2. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.